Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: infection and sepsis
Publication in refereed journal


Times Cited
Web of Science11WOS source URL (as at 10/06/2021) Click here for the latest count
Altmetrics Information
.

Other information
AbstractBackground: Perioperative infection and sepsis are of fundamental concern to perioperative clinicians. However, standardised endpoints are either poorly defined or not routinely implemented. The Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative was established to derive a set of standardised endpoints for use in perioperative clinical trials.

Methods: We undertook a systematic review to identify measures of infection and sepsis used in the perioperative literature. A multi-round Delphi consensus process that included more than 60 clinician researchers was then used to refine a recommended list of outcome measures.

Results: A literature search yielded 1857 titles of which 255 met inclusion criteria for endpoint extraction. A long list of endpoints, with definitions and timescales, was generated and those potentially relevant to infection and sepsis circulated to the theme subgroup and then the wider StEP-COMPAC working group, undergoing a three-stage Delphi process. The response rates for Delphi rounds 1, 3, and 3 were 89% (n = 8), 67% (n = 62), and 80% (n = 8), respectively. A set of 13 endpoints including fever, surgical site, and organ-specific infections as defined by the US Centres for Disease Control and Sepsis-3 are proposed for future use.

Conclusions: We defined a consensus list of standardised endpoints related to infection and sepsis for perioperative trials using an established and rigorous approach. Each endpoint was evaluated with respect to validity, reliability, feasibility, and patient centredness. One or more of these should be considered for inclusion in future perioperative clinical trials assessing infection, sepsis, or both, thereby permitting synthesis and comparison of future results.
All Author(s) ListBarnes J, Hunter J, Harris S, Shankar-Hari M, Diouf E, Jammer I, Kalkman C, Klein AA, Corcoran T, Dieleman S, Grocott MPW, Mythen MG; StEP-COMPAC group (Myles P, Gan TJ, Kurz A, Peyton P, Sessler D, Tramèr M, Cyna A, De Oliveira GS Jr, Wu C, Jensen M, Kehlet H, Botti M, Boney O, Haller G, Grocott M, Cook T, Fleisher L, Neuman M, Story D, Gruen R, Bampoe S, Evered L, Scott D, Silbert B, van Dijk D, Kalkman C, Chan M, Grocott H, Haller G, Eckenhoff R, Rasmussen L, Eriksson L, Beattie S, Wijeysundera D, Fleisher L, Landoni G, Leslie K, Biccard B, Howell S, Grocott H, Nagele P, Richards T, Lamy A, Lalu M, Pearse R, Mythen M, Canet J, Moller A, Gin T, Schultz M, Pelosi P, Gabreu M, Futier E, Creagh-Brown B, Lalu M, Fowler A, Abbott T, Mythen M, Kalkman C, Klein A, Corcoran T, Cooper DJ, Dieleman S, Diouf E, McIlroy D, Bellomo R, Shaw A, Prowle J, Karkouti K, Billings J, Wijeysundera D, Klein A, Richards T, Mazer D, Myles P, Jayarajah M, Karkouti K, Murphy M, Lamy A, Bartoszko J, Sneyd R, Beattie S, Fleisher L, Grocott M, Sessler D, Morris S, George R, Moonesinghe R, Chan M, Cook T, Myles P, Shulman M, Neuman M, Kalkman C, Lane-Fall M, Nilsson U, Stevenson N, Grocott M, Myles P, Pearse R, Kurz A, Moonesinghe R, Cooper JD, van Klei W, Cabrini L, Miller T, Pace N, Jackson S, Buggy D, Sessler D, Leslie K, Short T, Kurz A, Riedel B, Gottumukkala V, Pace N, Alkhaffaf B, Johnson M)
Journal nameBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Year2019
Month4
Volume Number122
Issue Number4
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages500 - 508
ISSN0007-0912
LanguagesEnglish-United Kingdom
Keywordscore outcome measures, infection, perioperative medicine, postoperative outcome, sepsis, standardised endpoints, surgical site infection

Last updated on 2021-11-06 at 00:20