Autonomous decision-making for antenatal screening in Pakistan: views held by women, men and health professionals in a low-middle income country
Publication in refereed journal


Times Cited
Altmetrics Information
.

Other information
AbstractPrenatal genetic technologies now are being implemented in LMICs, and while there is much research on the ethical, legal and social implications of such technologies in Western countries, there is a paucity of such research in LMICs, which have diverse cultural, religious, political, financial and health service contexts. This study aimed to explore views about women's autonomous decision-making for antenatal screening held by women, men and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in Pakistan. A Q-methodology study was conducted during June 2016 to January 2018 in Lahore, Pakistan. A total of 137 participants (60 women, 57 men, 20 HCPs) rank-ordered 41 statements. Following by-person factor analysis, four distinct viewpoints were identified. Three of these represent views held by women and men only: autonomous decision-making requires directive advice from doctors; autonomous decision-making requires the husband's involvement, where independent decision-making by the woman is considered culturally inappropriate; and opting for antenatal screening is a foregone decision. One contrasting viewpoint represents predominantly HCPs: autonomous decision-making is the couple's responsibility. These findings highlight that Western approaches to facilitating women's autonomy for antenatal screening are unlikely to be suitable for use in Pakistan. Instead, culturally appropriate practice guidelines are needed in LMICs to enable HCPs to adopt shared decision-making approaches in a way that enables them to facilitate active and joint decision-making by couples, while ensuring women exercise their autonomy.
Acceptance Date11/01/2019
All Author(s) ListShenaz Ahmed, Hussain Jafri, Yasmin Rashid, Huso Yi, Dong Dong, Jianfeng Zhu, Mushtaq Ahmed
Journal nameEuropean Journal of Human Genetics
Year2019
Month6
Volume Number27
Issue Number6
PublisherNATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
Pages848 - 856
ISSN1018-4813
LanguagesEnglish-United Kingdom
KeywordsInformed Choice, Physicians

Last updated on 2021-10-05 at 23:53