Knowledge in International Relations: Susceptibilities to Motivated Reasoning Among Experts and Non-Experts
Publication in refereed journal

Times Cited
Web of Science1WOS source URL (as at 18/09/2021) Click here for the latest count
Altmetrics Information

Other information
AbstractMotivated reasoning as a pervasive feature of human psychology poses challenges to the ideal of liberal democratic government, which relies on citizens’ rationality. Motivated reasoning is at least partially caused by a biased store of knowledge, a partial set of accumulated information that skews reasoning about important political issues. However, there is some evidence that specialized training in a given domain may reduce the effects of motivated reasoning within that domain. To test whether a similar phenomenon is evident in the field of international relations, a signal detection technique is used to measure knowledge of U.S. foreign policy among two samples, one of IR professors and one of laypersons. The results uncover significant differences between experts and nonexperts, indicating that training in IR helps to reduce biases in knowledge, potentially providing “knowledge constraints” on motivated reasoning. Nonetheless, some evidence of bias among IR professors remains, suggesting that knowledge constraints on motivated reasoning may not fully allay normative concerns of bias in the domain of international relations.
All Author(s) ListPeter Beattie, Danielle Snider
Journal nameJournal of Social and Political Psychology
Volume Number7
Issue Number1
Pages172 - 191
LanguagesEnglish-United States

Last updated on 2021-19-09 at 00:56