The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region at 20: Evaluating the Sino-British Joint Declaration
Publication in refereed journal


Times Cited
Web of Science1WOS source URL (as at 21/10/2020) Click here for the latest count
Altmetrics Information
.

Other information
AbstractPurpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine the two decades since Hong Kong’s return to Chinese sovereignty, assessing developments against the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration, the international agreement under which Hong Kong was transferred from British to Chinese sovereignty on July 1, 1997, and which first set out China’s “basic policies” toward Hong Kong.

Design/methodology/approach
The paper’s analysis of developments focuses particularly on areas of controversy, from the extent to which Hong Kong has enjoyed a “high degree of autonomy” to basic rights and freedoms and the legal and judicial systems.

Findings
It argues that on the whole, the policies set out in the Joint Declaration have been well implemented: Hong Kong has retained its separate systems since 1997, including rule of law and an independent judiciary, basic rights and freedoms, and separate government and social systems. However, especially since the “occupy” movement of 2014, questions about the sustainability of the “one country, two systems” arrangement have come to the surface.

Originality/value
The paper is distinctive in its assessment of developments against the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration.
Acceptance Date28/09/2017
All Author(s) ListTim Summers
Journal nameAsian Education and Development Studies
Year2018
Volume Number7
Issue Number1
PublisherEmerald
Pages89 - 101
ISSN2046-3162
eISSN2046-3170
LanguagesEnglish-United States
KeywordsHong Kong, One country, two systems, Hong Kong Basic Law, Sino-British Joint Declaration

Last updated on 2020-22-10 at 02:50