An institution-based view of global IPR history
Publication in refereed journal


Times Cited
Altmetrics Information
.

Other information
AbstractLeveraging the use of history to advance international business research, this article focuses on the crucial debate over intellectual property rights (IPR) between the United States and China. Ironically, during the 19th century the United States was not a leading IPR advocate as it is today, but was a leading IPR violator. Developing an institution-based view of IPR history, we identify three underlying theoretical mechanisms that help to explain IPR in the two countries – path dependence, long-term processes, and institutional transitions. We argue that both the US refusal to protect foreign IPR in the 19th century and the current Chinese lack of enthusiasm to meet US IPR demands embody rational responses to their respective situations. However, given long-term processes with intensifying isomorphic pressures, institutional transitions in favor of better IPR protection are quite possible. Finally, going above and beyond these two countries, we draw on the IPR history in over ten other countries to develop a more globally generalizable framework, which in turn contributes to the key question of how history matters.
Acceptance Date01/10/2016
All Author(s) ListMike W Peng, David Ahlstrom, Shawn M Carraher, Weilei (Stone) Shi
Journal nameJournal of International Business Studies
Year2017
Month9
Volume Number48
Issue Number7
PublisherSpringer-Palgrave
Place of PublicationNew York
Pages893 - 907
ISSN0047-2506
eISSN1478-6990
LanguagesEnglish-United States
Keywordsinstitution-based view, history, intellectual property rights (IPR), United States, China

Last updated on 2020-02-06 at 00:20