History and the Debate Over Intellectual Property
Publication in refereed journal


Times Cited
Altmetrics Information
.

Other information
AbstractThis article responds to recent calls for organizational research to address larger, more globally relevant questions and to pay attention to history, by analyzing the crucial debate over intellectual property rights (IPR) between the United States and China. Despite the recent US position, the United States has not always been a leading IPR advocate. Rather, it was a leading IPR violator during the nineteenth century. An institution-based view of IPR history suggests that both the US refusal to protect foreign IPR in the nineteenth century and the current Chinese lack of enthusiasm to meet US IPR demands represent rational choices. However, as cost-benefit considerations change institutional transitions are possible. We predict that to the same extent the United States voluntarily agreed to strengthen IPR protection when its economy became sufficiently innovation-driven, China will similarly improve its IPR protection.
All Author(s) ListMike W. Peng, David Ahlstrom, Shawn M. Carraher, Weilei (Stone) Shi
Journal nameManagement and Organization Review
Year2017
Month3
Volume Number13
Issue Number1
PublisherCambridge University Press
Place of PublicationUnited Kingdom
Pages15 - 38
ISSN1740-8776
eISSN1740-8784
LanguagesEnglish-United States
KeywordsChina, history, institution-based view, intellectual property rights (IPR), United States

Last updated on 2020-28-06 at 02:03