Prognostic values of 4 risk scores in Chinese patients with chest pain Prospective 2-centre cohort study
Publication in refereed journal


Times Cited
Web of Science8WOS source URL (as at 21/01/2021) Click here for the latest count
Altmetrics Information
.

Other information
AbstractFour risk scores for stratifying patients with chest pain presenting to emergency departments (EDs) (namely Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction [TIMI], Global registry for acute coronary events [GRACE], Banach and HEART) have been developed in Western settings but have never been compared and validated in Chinese patients. We aimed to find out to the number of MACE within 7 days, 30 days, and 6 months after initial ED presentation, and also to compare the prognostic performance of these scores in Chinese patients with suspected cardiac chest pain (CCP) to predict 7-day, 30-day, and 6-month major adverse cardiac events (MACE).A prospective 2-center observational cohort study of consecutive patients presenting with chest pain to the EDs of 2 university hospitals in Guangdong and Hong Kong from 17 March 2012 to 14 August 2013 was conducted. Patients aged >= 18 years with suspected CCP but without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were recruited.Of 833 enrolled patients (mean age 65.1 years, SD14.5; 55.6% males), 121 (14.5%) experienced MACE within 6 months (4.8% with safety outcomes and 10.3% with effectiveness outcomes). The HEART score had the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for predicting MACE at 7-day, 30-day, and 6-month follow-up [area under curve (AUC) = 0.731, 0.726, and 0.747, respectively. The HEART score also had the largest AUC for predicting effectiveness outcome (AUC = 0.715, 0.704, and 0.721, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in AUC between HEART and TIMI scores. Banach had the largest AUC for predicting safety outcome (AUC = 0.856, 0.837, and 0.850, respectively).The HEART score performed better than the GRACE and Banach scores to predict total MACE and effectiveness outcome in Chinese patients with suspected CCP, whereas the Banach score best predicted safety outcomes.
All Author(s) ListChen XH, Jiang HL, Li YM, Chan CPY, Mo JR, Tian CW, Lin PY, Graham CA, Rainer TH
Journal nameMedicine
Year2016
Month12
Day1
Volume Number95
Issue Number52
PublisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
ISSN0025-7974
eISSN1536-5964
LanguagesEnglish-United Kingdom
KeywordsBanach, cardiac, chest pain, Chinese, emergency department, Global registry for acute coronary event, HEART, MACE, predictive, prognostic, risk stratification, score, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction
Web of Science Subject CategoriesMedicine, General & Internal;General & Internal Medicine

Last updated on 2021-22-01 at 01:14