Autonomy, Neutrality, and Perfectionism
Chapter in an edited book (author)
Full Text
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) DOI for CUHK Users |
Altmetrics Information
.
Other information
AbstractIn this chapter, we aim to argue that 1) the idea of autonomy fails to justify the neutrality principle, according to which the state should be neutral between particular, disputed conceptions of the good life; and 2) autonomy raises a serious challenge to perfectionism, which is the view that it is permissible for the state to use any means, even coercion, to promote the good. By analyzing two aspects of autonomy: autonomy as coherence and autonomy as independence, we attempt to demonstrate that a person’s living a way of life is manifestly valuable only if she is pursuing it autonomously. While some methods of advancing particular conceptions of the good life may violate the citizens’ autonomy, we argue, other methods are compatible with the value of autonomy.
All Author(s) ListYingying Tang, Lei Zhong
All Editor(s) ListHon-Lam Li, Michael Campbell
Book titlePublic Reason and Bioethics: Three Perspectives
Year2021
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages317 - 335
ISBN978-3-030-61169-9
eISBN978-3-030-61170-5
LanguagesEnglish-United States