Anger and perception of unfairness and harm: Cultural differences in normative processes that justify sanction assignment
Publication in refereed journal


Times Cited
Web of Science7WOS source URL (as at 09/01/2021) Click here for the latest count
Altmetrics Information
.

Other information
AbstractDrawing on moral foundation theory, the author found that in response to an infringement of intellectual property rights, both US and Chinese samples reported anger and evaluated the infringement negatively. The results also highlight the importance of considering cultural factors in moral decision-making. Apparently, in Chinese culture, moral decisions tend to be norm-based, even when people are assigning sanction to a transgression of the ethics of autonomy. In contrast, in American culture, moral decisions tend to be preference-based. Furthermore, although people tend to express their anger through punishment and contempt and disgust with social exclusion, in the American context, due to its relatively high mobility, to express their moral anger, individuals prefer to sanction wrongdoing by socially isolating the wrongdoer.
All Author(s) ListKwan LYY
Journal nameAsian Journal of Social Psychology
Year2016
Month1
Day1
Volume Number19
Issue Number1
PublisherWILEY-BLACKWELL
Pages6 - 15
ISSN1367-2223
eISSN1467-839X
LanguagesEnglish-United Kingdom
Keywordscross-culture; moral foundation theory; morality
Web of Science Subject CategoriesPsychology; Psychology, Social

Last updated on 2021-10-01 at 01:39