Methodological quality of meta-analyses on treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study using the AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) tool
Publication in refereed journal


Times Cited
Web of Science24WOS source URL (as at 20/02/2021) Click here for the latest count
Altmetrics Information
.

Other information
AbstractBACKGROUND: Meta-analysis (MA) of randomised trials is considered to be one of the best approaches for summarising high-quality evidence on the efficacy and safety of treatments. However, methodological flaws in MAs can reduce the validity of conclusions, subsequently impairing the quality of decision making.
All Author(s) ListHo RST, Wu XY, Yuan JQ, Liu SY, Lai X, Wong SYS, Chung VCH
Journal namenpj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
Year2015
Month1
Day8
Volume Number25
PublisherNATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
ISSN2055-1010
LanguagesEnglish-United Kingdom
Web of Science Subject CategoriesGeneral & Internal Medicine; Primary Health Care; Respiratory System

Last updated on 2021-21-02 at 00:51