Constitutional Competition Between the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal and the Chinese National People's Congress Standing Committee: A Game Theory Perspective
Publication in refereed journal


Times Cited
Web of Science4WOS source URL (as at 29/06/2020) Click here for the latest count
Altmetrics Information
.

Other information
AbstractThe competition between the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal, a cosmopolitan common law supreme court, and the Chinese National People's Congress Standing Committee, a Leninist parliamentary body, over the proper meaning of the Hong Kong Basic Law constituted a very important facet of the territory's constitutional history since the end of British rule in 1997. This article applies the insights of game theory to explain why constitutional stability, in the sense that the two players have never entered into an open collision with each other despite the ambiguity of the Basic Law and the One Country, Two Systems formula, endured until the present day. It is argued that successful coordination between the two resulted from the strong aversion of the Court and the Standing Committee to constitutional crises, as well as from the fact that neither entity was capable of credibly signaling its commitment to an aggressive strategy all the time.
All Author(s) ListIp EC
Journal nameLaw & Social Inquiry
Year2014
Month9
Day1
Volume Number39
Issue Number4
PublisherWILEY-BLACKWELL
Pages824 - 848
ISSN0897-6546
eISSN1747-4469
LanguagesEnglish-United Kingdom
Web of Science Subject CategoriesGovernment & Law; Law

Last updated on 2020-30-06 at 06:11