Seeking Worldwide Professional Consensus on the Principles of End-of-Life Care for the Critically III The Consensus for Worldwide End-of-Life Practice for Patients in Intensive Care Units (WELPICUS) Study
Publication in refereed journal

Times Cited
Web of Science112WOS source URL (as at 10/04/2021) Click here for the latest count
Altmetrics Information

Other information
AbstractGreat differences in end-of-life practices in treating the critically ill around the world warrant agreement regarding the major ethical principles. This analysis determines the extent of worldwide consensus for end-of-life practices, delineates where there is and is not consensus, and analyzes reasons for lack of consensus. Critical care societies worldwide were invited to participate. Country coordinators were identified and draft statements were developed for major end-of-life issues and translated into six languages. Multidisciplinary responses using a web-based survey assessed agreement or disagreement with definitions and statements linked to anonymous demographic information. Consensus was prospectively defined as >80% agreement. Definitions and statements not obtaining consensus were revised based on comments of respondents, and then translated and redistributed. Of the initial 1,283 responses from 32 countries, consensus was found for 66(81%) of the 81 definitions and statements; 26 (32%) had >90% agreement. With 83 additional responses to the original questionnaire (1,366 total) and 604 responses to the revised statements, consensus could be obtained for another 11 of the 15 statements. Consensus was obtained for informed consent, withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment, legal requirements, intensive care unit therapies, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, shared decision making, medical and nursing consensus, brain death, and palliative care. Consensus was obtained for 77 of 81 (95%) statements. Worldwide consensus could be developed for the majority of definitions and statements about end-of-life practices. Statements achieving consensus provide standards of practice for end-of-life care; statements without consensus identify important areas for future research.
All Author(s) ListSprung CL, Truog RD, Curtis JR, Joynt GM, Baras M, Michalsen A, Briegel J, Kesecioglu J, Efferen L, De Robertis E, Bulpa P, Metnitz P, Patil N, Hawryluck L, Manthous C, Moreno R, Leonard S, Hill NS, Wennberg E, McDermid RC, Mikstacki A, Mularski RA, Hartog CS, Avidan A
Journal nameAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Volume Number190
Issue Number8
Pages855 - 866
LanguagesEnglish-United Kingdom
Keywordscardiopulmonary resuscitation; do-not-resuscitate orders; end-of-life decisions; intensive care unit; withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment
Web of Science Subject CategoriesCritical Care Medicine; General & Internal Medicine; Respiratory System

Last updated on 2021-11-04 at 00:19