Angel investors' selection criteria: A comparative institutional perspective
Publication in refereed journal

Times Cited
Web of Science31WOS source URL (as at 15/10/2021) Click here for the latest count
Altmetrics Information

Other information
AbstractDespite the important role of angel investors as critical financial providers for new ventures, little is known regarding how the institutions present in very different institutional environments impact their investment decisions. While angel investors might be expected to make decisions based on similar selection criteria, they are also embedded within and affected by different institutional settings in which they invest, and as a result they give these criteria weight that are different from those of other investors. We compare angel investors' selection criteria in China and Denmark utilizing a comparative institutional perspective. Utilizing a policy-capturing approach to understanding their decision criteria, we find that angel investors in China, embedded within relationship-based institutions, tend to rely more on strong ties such as family and friends in the management team. They also give risks less weight as compared with angel investors in Denmark, which operate within more rule-based institutional contexts. As with venture capitalists, angel investors modify their decision criteria to fit the local institutional conditions.
All Author(s) ListDing ZJ, Sun SL, Au K
Journal nameAsia Pacific Journal of Management
Volume Number31
Issue Number3
PublisherSpringer Verlag (Germany)
Pages705 - 731
LanguagesEnglish-United Kingdom
KeywordsAngel investor; China; Comparative institutional perspective; Denmark; Emerging economies; Entrepreneurship
Web of Science Subject CategoriesBusiness & Economics; Management

Last updated on 2021-15-10 at 23:47