Atmospheric delay analysis from GPS meteorology and InSAR APS
Publication in refereed journal


Times Cited
Web of Science6WOS source URL (as at 04/07/2020) Click here for the latest count
Altmetrics Information
.

Other information
AbstractRadar atmospheric decorrelation due to inhomogeneity of atmospheric refractivity is a critical limitation of satellite SAR interferometry (InSAR) in the high accuracy retrieving of geophysical parameters. With mm precision, a water vapor tracing technique based on GPS meteorology was widely employed to mitigate InSAR atmospheric errors. However, a reliable comparison of atmospheric delay between GPS and InSAR is rarely touched, mainly due to the scarcity of stable and accurate InSAR atmospheric phases. In the paper we propose a comparison methodology between,GPS Zenith Tropospheric Delay (ZTD) and SAR Atmospheric Phase Screen (APS) in both differential and pseudo-absolute modes. In the experiment, ENVISAT ASAR APS maps and synchronous GPS campaign measurements in Como, Italy were collected for consistency analysis. Furthermore, the stratification effect of atmospheric delay, in a form of delay-to-elevation ratios, was particularly analyzed for the purpose of separating different components within APSs. Finally, with the above stratification analysis, terms of stratification and assumed turbulence from SAR APS and GPS were compared in differential mode. Presented results show that the stratified ratios from GPS delays and SAR APS maps are in agreement with a std of 7.7 mm/km and a bias of 3.4 mm/km. Correlation coefficients of stratified ratios are higher than 0.7 in ascending case. In differential mode, the atmospheric total delays coincide with STandard Deviations (STDs) smaller than 4 mm (similar to 0.65 mm PWV) and with correlation coefficients higher than 0.6. The comparison of total delays in 'pseudo-absolute' mode is provided as an alternative vision of the agreement between GPS and InSAR. The agreement in this mode was slightly worse than that in differential mode. STDs of the difference are smaller than 6 mm (similar to 1 mm PWV), and the correlation coefficients are about 0.5 for different implementation approaches. Above comparison results in the work provide a quantitative extent to which atmospheric measurements from GPS and SAR APS are comparable. Another significant finding is that in most cases the STD of difference (between GPS and SAR APS) is slightly smaller than STD of SAR APS itself in both comparison modes. It implies the potentiality to correct atmospheric errors in SAR interferometry with high-precision GPS meteorological products, i.e. tropospheric delay or water vapor. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
All Author(s) ListCheng SL, Perissin D, Lin H, Chen FL
Journal nameJournal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics
Year2012
Month9
Day1
Volume Number86
PublisherElsevier
Pages71 - 82
ISSN1364-6826
LanguagesEnglish-United Kingdom
KeywordsAtmospheric phase screen; GPS; SAR interferometry; Zenith tropospheric delay
Web of Science Subject CategoriesGeochemistry & Geophysics; GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES

Last updated on 2020-05-07 at 00:39