False belief, complementation language, and contextual bias in preschoolers
Publication in refereed journal

Times Cited
Web of Science8WOS source URL (as at 23/10/2020) Click here for the latest count
Altmetrics Information

Other information
AbstractIn the present study, we address two questions concerning the relation between children's false belief and their understanding of complex object complements. The first question is whether the previously demonstrated association between tensed complements and false belief generalizes to infinitival complements (de Villiers & Pyers, 2002). The second question is whether the relation is altered by the perceptual saliency of test objects (i.e., reality pull) and expressed desire of story characters (i.e., desire pull) as extraneous contextual factors. In Study 1, unexpectedly, we showed in a group of 4-year-olds that false belief correlated with comprehension of infinitival but not tensed complements. In Studies 2 and 3 it was found that a significant part of the association was explainable by a reality/desire pull built into the test context. We conclude that the relation between false belief and complementation is context-sensitive. The perceptual saliency of certain test objects and desire of story characters may in some situations bias the child towards attending more to the commonality between false belief and complement understanding, which enhances their association.
All Author(s) ListNg L, Cheung H, Xiao W
Journal nameInternational Journal of Behavioral Development
Volume Number34
Issue Number2
PublisherSAGE Publications (UK and US)
Pages168 - 179
LanguagesEnglish-United Kingdom
Keywordscomplements; false belief; reality/desire pull; theory of mind
Web of Science Subject CategoriesPsychology; Psychology, Developmental; PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL

Last updated on 2020-24-10 at 00:30