Revisit of prevailing practice guidelines and investigation of topographical treatment techniques in CFD-Based air ventilation assessments
Publication in refereed journal


Times Cited
Altmetrics Information
.

Other information
AbstractComputational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a mature method in wind engineering studies, but many air ventilation assessment (AVA) reports prepared by consulting firms in Hong Kong still suffer from the use of inappropriate techniques and computational settings in the CFD modeling stage. The main reason behind this is the lack of informative guidelines relating to CFD model settings in the AVA Technical Circular issued by local authorities. Other aspects of AVA that require improvement include terrain modeling techniques and understanding the sensitivity of modeled topographical size to the wind environment.

This paper revisits and summarizes important aspects of current best-practice guidelines for robust CFD simulations. The study compares two conventional approaches to terrain treatment through a series of sensitivity tests. The first approach uses terrain features to cover the entire ground of the computational domain, whereas the second imitates wind tunnel experiments in which the domain includes an inclined buffer area. One drawback of the first approach was found to be the occurrence of numerical divergence when the terrain size is small; meanwhile, in the latter approach, the inclination angle of the buffer area must not exceed 30° to achieve robust results.

The final stage of the study validates the results of CFD simulations based on the two approaches with experimental data from a dense city. The approach that mimics wind tunnel experiments with a buffer zone was found to achieve better correlations, and smaller normalized mean square errors with respect to the experimental data and is thus considered superior.
Acceptance Date27/11/2019
All Author(s) ListKarl An, Sze-Ming Wong, Jimmy Chi-Hung Fung, Edward Ng
Journal nameBuilding and Environment
Year2020
Month2
Volume Number169
PublisherElsevier
Place of PublicationThe Netherlands
Article number106580
ISSN0360-1323
eISSN1873-684X
LanguagesEnglish-United Kingdom
KeywordsTerrain modeling, Air ventilation assessments, Best practice guidelines, CFD simulations

Last updated on 2021-20-06 at 00:18